Hi, I'm Rachel Hills.

I'm a London-based (via Sydney, Australia) writer, researcher and contributor to publications including the Sydney Morning Herald's Sunday Life, Cosmopolitan, Vogue, Glamour, Jezebel, Alternet and more. I'm also writing a book about Gen Y, sex and identity. This is my blog.

I'd love to hear from you. Submit a question to my Ask Rachel column here, send me an email here, connect with me on Twitter here or find out more about my paid work at www.rachelhills.net.

Don't miss a post. Get daily Musings delivered to your inbox:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Tweets @rachelhills
Posts tagged "ask rachel"
Asker pyjamasam Asks:
Hey Rachel! I was just wondering: how did you start your writing carreer? As in: what did you study, where did you start your first job,... I would like to do something similar to what you are doing right now when I'm a bit more grown-up (I'm 16 now). Thanks!
rachelhills rachelhills Said:

Hi Sam. I started my writing career… by writing, and submitting my work until people would pay me for it.  

When I graduated from university (Media & Comms, University of Sydney) I knew I wanted to write. I also knew what I wanted to write about (gender, social issues, politics), and who I wanted to be writing for (major newspapers and glossy magazines). I also knew that jobs at said publications were few and far between, and that my chances of getting one were low.

BUT - through my work as an editor at Vibewire, I knew a few other young writers who were getting work at those publications. So I decided to follow their lead and just start submitting my stuff until someone would publish it.

They did - and quite quickly - but it took about a year to turn that into a remotely liveable income, and two years to turn that into actual employment. I later decided I preferred working for myself, and now I’ve been freelancing full time again for two years. I couldn’t be happier, but it’s definitely not for everyone.

Other ways I’ve seen people start careers as writers/journalists include:

- Work experience/interning. The main avenue through which most people I know in magazines and broadcast got hired.
- Cadetships. Common in newspapers and broadcast.
- Taking jobs at less glamorous publications (trade magazines, local papers, etc) and leveraging that experience to get their foot in the door at their dream gig.
- Starting a blog and turning it into a business.

None of them are easy (or foolproof!), but all have worked for someone. I hope that helps. :)

I would love your opinion. I have always been what is traditionally considered "feminine" but I have also always considered myself a feminist. I haven't felt that the two were mutually exclusive, but lately I've been starting to worry. Is there anything wrong with wearing makeup & being "girlie" as a feminist? I've also seen radfem statements that heterosexuality is antifeminist. What's your take on this? I can't help being hetero - and my relationship is very equal and independent. So confused!
rachelhills rachelhills Said:

I think you know the answer to this already, but of course! Are feminist arguments about make-up and compulsory heterosexuality valid? Sure. It is absolutely true that we inhabit a culture that tells women that we are prettier and altogether better people if we wear make-up (or if we just look like we’re wearing it). It’s also true that we live in a society that makes it a hell of a lot easier to be heterosexual than, well, anything else.

But that doesn’t mean that putting on make-up or dressing yourself in a traditionally feminine way can’t be a positive and (dare I say it?) empowering experience. And there are certainly plenty of women out there who are heterosexual… because (shock, horror) they just like having sex with men. I definitely don’t buy the argument that heterosexuality is innately sexist or disempowering.

I’ll leave you with a quote from Tavi Gevinson: “girls … think that to be feminists they have to live up to being perfectly consistent in their beliefs, never being insecure, never having doubts, having all the answers… And this is not true. And actually recognising all the contradictions I was feeling became easier once I realised that feminism was not a rulebook but a discussion, a conversation, a process.

She’s a smart cookie.

See also: We’re all bad feminists, really.

Asker rareuser Asks:
When you say that guys and gals are hooking up every few months with people they aren't in a relationship with are they hooking up with people they already know somewhat or are these people they just met at a party? Please explain the context that these hook ups take place. Thanks.
rachelhills rachelhills Said:

The short answer is that it depends on the person. Some people hook up with friends, some people hook up with people they’ve just met. Some people have sex with/make out with the same person on an ongoing basis, for others it’s a one-off thing when they’re drunk. Some people - quite a lot of them, actually - are entirely (or almost entirely) celibate when they’re not in a relationship, others pick up a new person almost every week. There are also a whole lot of people out there who are make-out happy, but who had sex with only a small portion of the people they’ve kissed.

But that’s probably not what you’re after, so I’ll give you a few examples of common patterns amongst people I’ve spoken to:

1)       Hooking up often, but with the same person/people. “Hook up culture is 100% true,” one of my recent interviewees told me, regaling me with tales of college parties “where everyone slept around.” I queried her on this, pointing to statistics that suggest that the average college student sleeps with four people over four years of university. Did she think those statistics were wrong, I asked her - or at least not in line with her experiences and observations? No, she said, they were right too. She explained: “You would have sex with the same person consistently for a season, and you would have sex with them casually. … [I]f the next weekend, if you slept with someone else, that would be a big drama. But it was still very casual sex. It wasn’t like you were doing it because you were in love and wanted to get married.”

2)       Sporadic, “seasonal” sex. Not as in “I only have sex in the spring”, but lots of the people I’ve interviewed go through phases. Maybe they slept with a bunch of people they met in bars (or on Adult Matchmaker) in their first year at university, but stopped having casual sex soon after. Maybe they’ll have a couple of one nighters in the aftermaths of a long-term relationship. Maybe they’re long term singles who have a two-week fling once or twice a week. I’ve also spoken with quite a few people (particularly on the younger end of my spectrum) whose only experiences with sex have been casual and sporadic – and often alcohol fuelled.

3)       Making out with lots of strangers, but not going further than groping on the dance floor.

4)       Not hooking up at all. Statistically, they’re a minority, but there are still more 20-something virgins out there than you think.

5)       Having sex in monogamous dating relationships, either primarily or only. According to data from the2008 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (USA), the most common sex and relationships pattern is not actually casual sex, but serial monogamy.

Related: The Hook-Up Myth
Help wanted: want to be in my book?

Hi Rachel! What did you study in university? Did it help you write the way you do now? Also, on a completely different note, what made you choose over Tumblr to Wordpress? I mean, yes, Tumblr is a pretty rad place for a blogging platform. It's just that most post entries are more photo-based and less of a place for long reads. Thank you so much for taking the time to reading/answering my silly questions. Did I forgot to mention I love your blog? I love your blog!
rachelhills rachelhills Said:

Hi Pam! I studied Media & Communications at university, with co-majors in Gender Studies and English, and the odd subject in Sociology, Psychology and Government.

I’m glad I did arts/humanities subjects in addition to the journalism stuff, because I think it taught me how to join analyse and join the dots, as well as giving me a whole bunch of subject matter to get passionate about (which I think is as important to “being a writer” as writing itself). I was also lucky to study at a university which had a rich and fantastic campus culture, which played a role in my intellectual and political development as well.

As for why I chose Tumblr… the easiest answer is that way back at the tail end of 2007, all the cool kids were doing it. It seemed like a good platform on which to connect with people as well as put my ideas out there – and I still think it is more social than Wordpress or Blogger. Although I agree that it isn’t the best fit for my wordy posts!

Mihal asks: You’ve interviewed some fabulous women, do you have any tips of the best way to approach people for an interview - someone like Caitlin Moran, did you approach her directly or go through a publicist?

As a general rule of thumb, the more famous the person is, the more likely gatekeepers are involved. So, interviews like Tina Fey, Natalie Portman, Kate Moss? Were all organised via a negotiation between my editors and their publicists. My only involvement was being the contributor lucky enough to get to interview them.

People who are well known in their fields but not internationally famous are a different kettle of fish, though. I thought I came up with the Caitlin Moran profile on my own, so much is it “the kind of story that I would write”, but a quick check of my email archives reveals that her Australian publicist (whom I knew through our days on a certain magazine forum ten years ago) contacted me and asked me if I’d be interested in writing something about her book.

I then pitched a profile to my editor - explaining who she was, as she hadn’t “broken” in Australia at that point, although she was getting heaps of buzz in the UK - the idea was accepted, and Caitlin’s publicist put me in touch with her directly to organise a time and place (something that would never happen with Tina Fey… unless you worked for the New Yorker or something, and then maybe). If that hadn’t happened, I wouldn’t have hesitated to contact her over Twitter, email, or to approach her publicist in Australia or the UK myself.

So, a couple of tips for setting up similar interviews yourself:

- Look for people who are doing work that will be of interest to the publication’s readership, but who aren’t “celebrities” per se (I’m thinking people like writers, designers, artists, chefs, directors, activists, business people and so on… you get the idea). These people are usually more interesting to speak to than A-listers anyway, because they haven’t already had 93 previous magazine profiles written about them.

- To approach the publication or the interviewee first? Chicken or egg? It depends on who you have the stronger relationship with. When I’ve pitched these kinds of stories, I’ve often done it tentatively: here’s an interesting person, here’s why they’re interesting, here’s why I’d be a great person to write about it. Then, if the editor expresses interest, I’ll go away, approach the interviewee and ask if they’d be interested in doing a profile with that publication. If you don’t have strong clips though and you do have an existing tie to the interviewee, it might be worth getting their buy-in first, to make your pitch more solid.

- You don’t need to write profiles in order to interview interesting people. I speak to interesting writers, researchers, commentators and so on all the time for topic-based feature stories. When writing these, don’t be afraid to aim high - approach the most exciting people you can for comment. The worst they can do is say ‘no’.

I hope that helps! How do others go about organising these types of stories?

Got a burning question you’d like me to answer? Click here.

Related: Why hiring a writing coach was the best $240 I ever spent
Seven enviable lines: advice for freelance writers
Ask Rachel: How do I write a killer magazine/newspaper/website pitch?

Asker bowietobowie Asks:
recently I had a night out with some girl friends, and we went clubbing. towards the end of the night, as I was walking through the dance floor a guy lifted up my skirt and tried to grab me. I rushed away and immediately told my friends how offended and grossed out I was about the incident. They laughed it off and were genuinely surprised that I was so worked up about it, and told me that i should 'get used to it' and stop 'acting like a feminist. How can i make them see how wrong it really was?
rachelhills rachelhills Said:

Years ago, I was at a pub with friends one night where this guy was making a game of slapping women on the ass with a novelty plastic hand. He’d already done it to one of my friends, so when I went downstairs to buy myself another drink, I was prepared.

I could feel him creeping up behind me, and just as he was poised to slapped and turned around and said, “No. Look, I know you probably don’t mean any harm, but as someone who has to put up with this on a daily basis, I find it really exhausting and offensive. You might think you’re being really funny, but it’s not just you – it’s a constant barrage of sexual harassment. How would you feel if someone did that to your mother?” Or something like that anyway. I was a bit on edge after a particularly upsetting catcall a few days before.

He was mortified and apologised immediately. Better yet, he came up to me again several times that night to check that I was okay. It was awesome: awesome because I stood up for myself, awesome because he got the message, and awesome because it all happened in a fairly calm and friendly way (if also a pretty damn earnest one). Nightclub feminist success!

But one of the reasons I share this story with you is because, to be honest, it’s one of the few successes I’ve had in that field. I’ve had a lot of friends with very different views on gender to my own, and most of the time, I find it easier to just banter it out with them than to try to convince them otherwise. I’m not sure there is a way you can “make them see how wrong it really was”… unless they’re open to seeing it to begin with.

Chances are, like the guy in the pub, your friends think that a bit of nightclub ass-groping is just a bit of flirty fun. And maybe, like my guy in the pub, it was meant flirtatiously: but it also suggests that the guy doing the grabbing felt like he had the right to put his hand to any bit of female flesh he pleased, disregarding the fact that, you know, there might be a person in there, with thoughts and feelings and her own free will. You could try talking to your friends about that, or you could ask them to explain why lifting a stranger’s skirt up in a nightclub is fine in their opinion, but presumably not on the street.

But if they’re not open to the gender arguments, your best bet may be appealing to their emotions. Explain how it made you feel, as well as why. They can argue with the whys, but most people don’t want their friends to feel bad. And if they are cool with you feeling bad, they’re not very good friends, are they? On this issue, at least.