23/11/2009
Britney Spears and why it’s painful to be beautiful
I saw her on Thursday night.
A lot has been said in Australia about the quality of her performance, most of it centred around the fact that she doesn’t actually sing. To those people, I say, “who goes to a Britney Spears concert expecting her to sing?” We established 10 years ago that it wasn’t her forte. Back then I was pretty pissed off about it too (being a self-righteous teenager at the time - and one who sang at that), but these days she’s more a symbol than she is a singer. And her show is more a Circus-with-a-capital-C than a concert.
Even on that level, it had its failings, though. It was much like one of her albums, in that there were some incredible high points (multi-media, Perez Hilton, the first three songs and the last two or three), and a whole lot of filler in the middle. And she spent way too much time off stage. I paid [ridiculous amount of money] to see Britney Spears, not her dancers.
But five-song lulls mean time for thinking, and I spent most of it thinking about just how much the success of Britney Spears - and even her mental health - is measured and predicated on the way she looks. As I’ve written before: Britney with fat on her body is read as ”off the rails”; skinny, toned Britney means “she’s baaaaack” - as much so as the quality of her albums or songs.
She looked fantastic on Thursday night, absolutely beautiful. But looking at her made me feel sad, because it reminded me of how much work - and probably anguish - goes into keeping her looking like that.
Two and a half years ago, she shaved her head. Now her hair is long, blonde and half-way down her back, but you could see quite clearly where her real hair ended and the extensions began. Her body was perfectly proportioned and toned - but we’ve all seen enough photos to know that she doesn’t look like she did when she was 20 anymore without a lot of work. (And even then I recall reading that she did 1000 sit ups each day. And possibly had bulimia.)
Recently, I wrote a feature article about the lives of the ridiculously beautiful. One of the things that came out of it was that even for the proms queens of this world - the kind of women who get approached on the street by legitimate modelling agencies and put on their books - being “the beautiful girl” takes work.
And that even if you naturally possess all the qualities that make a woman considered beautiful by the majority of people, it’s still something you can turn up and down, even on and off, at will - through clothing, hairstyle, make up, high heels, etc. So much of what we think of as beautiful is really about performing femininity, regardless of your body shape or bone structure.
For the story, I spoke to Dr Meredith Jones, a researcher from UTS. She told me that contrary to the “ugly duckling” stereotype, conventionally attractive people were actually more likely to get cosmetic surgery than less attractive people. They knew the feeling that comes from being loved and appreciated from their looks, and were terrified of it going away. Or, you know, wanted to give that “love” a little boost.
And so we see Britney Spears. A woman who has - I think, at least - all the gifts of conventional beauty, who gets shit lumped on her whenever she dares to gain five kilos, get a pimple or not blow dry her hair. And who gets showered with financial and emotional rewards whenever she follows the script.
Photo posted at 10:00
18/08/2009
From the vault: "Something about the way you look tonight"
Over the weekend, Fuck Politeness linked and responded to a post by Melissa McEwan, about the often confronting experience of witnessing sexist behaviour from men one likes: “intellectual men, clever men, engaged men”. Men who identify as progressive.
Not every man does all of these things, or even most of them, and certainly not all the time. But it only takes one, randomly and occasionally, exploding in a shower of cartoon stars like an unexpected punch in the nose, to send me staggering sideways, wondering what just happened.
Well. I certainly didn’t see that coming…
Men aren’t the only people do it, of course, nor are they immune from being on the receiving end of it. There are all sorts of reasons a person might flinch at that kind of subtle (to the person delivering it, at least), institutionalised, unintentional prejudice: race, sexuality, class, the shape and abilities of one’s body. I’ve been guilty of it myself, on this here blog - and the times I’ve had it pointed out to me, while they’ve felt like a bit of a slap in the face, have also been hugely instrumental in challenging and refining my politics.
In any case, FP and McEwan’s posts reminded me of this one I wrote around five years ago now, back in my blonde, pink-clad phase. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Clearly, like many blonde, pink-clad lasses, the peroxide and stereotypically feminine attire did not prevent me from thinking critically or articulating my thoughts. I mention my aesthetics only because they contextualise some of my comments. Like being described as a “barbie doll”, which would be utterly nonsensical now.
Names and identifying details removed, natch.
——————————-
It occurred to me last night that perhaps my tendency to interpret every comment any guy makes about another female’s appearance (“[redacted]’s hot”, “[redacted] has fat thighs”, “We used to like to play this game where we walk down the street and rate each girl that walked past on her face, breasts and legs”) as personally offensive to me might not be purely a sign of Absolut Neuroticism so much as an accurate sign that, well, it really is about me.
Not about me exclusively, of course, but about women in general.
When I hear guys I know begin to evaluate another girl’s appearance it makes me feel uncomfortable because it serves as a reminder that they, and others, are evaluating my appearance, that there is very little I can do to control their evaluation, and that I have no way of ever really knowing what that evaluation is.
Last night, I went with a few friends to a bar in Sydney’s CBD. Towards the end of the night, a group of people a little older than myself came into the bar, including a blonde, possibly tanned, girl in a trench-coat. I probably wouldn’t have noticed her if Guy1 hadn’t pointed her out.
“Is she for real, or is she made of plastic?” Guy1 asked us.
Guy2 started laughing and Girl and I just looked confused. “Huh? Who?” I asked.
“The blonde in the trench coat,” Guy1 said.
“She looks like she’s plastic,” Guy2 said.
“Are you saying she’s good looking, or…?” Girl asked.
“No, she just doesn’t look real…” someone said.
“She just looks like a blonde girl in a trench coat to me,” I said.
So there was discussion for a minute or so on how this girl apparently didn’t look real (and she really did just look like a blonde girl in a trench coat to me) before I collapsed back into my chair and said, “I hate men.”
“No you don’t,” Guy2 said.
“Yes I do,” I said. “I hate men.”
“It’s a love-hate relationship,” Guy2 said.
“No, I really do hate men.”
“Why? Guy1’s being totally PC… he’s saying people should just be real and not look plastic,” Guy2 said.
I couldn’t pinpoint what I found so upsetting and offensive at the time, my reaction was purely visceral. But in retrospect, it was because she could have been me - or any other woman, really. Just because she was blonde and apparently (Girl decided) looked like Sarah Michelle Gellar didn’t mean she deserved to have people talking about the way she looked when in all likelihood all she wanted to do was sit down and have a couple of drinks with her friends.
I’ve had guys refer to me as “that girl who looks like a barbie doll” before, and while it may be intended as a means of saying “she’s attractive”, all it really does it reduce you to a flat, plastic sex object. Equally, I’m sure I’ve had guys refer to me as “an ugly ho-bag”. The difference between the two is minimal.
Of course, there are ways we can express our appreciation of other people’s appearances and attractiveness without being demeaning. I genuinely appreciate it when people who know me tell me I look beautiful, or fabulous, or that I am wonderful. Because there are occasions (particularly when it comes from the mouth of someone who isn’t inclined to say it to every girl and her pet budgie) when it seems like they really mean it. And it doesn’t seem demeaning because I know that they know that there is more to me than that.
But yeah. Objectification pisses me off.
——————————-
Now, Guy1 and Guy2 would probably flinch as much at being labelled sexist as I did at the judgemental things they said. They certainly did when I called them out on other instances of subtle sexism. But the point isn’t to have a go at them so much as it is to show how ingrained such attitudes are, how even people who don’t mean to offend can do so accidentally. And the fact that they didn’t mean to hurt anyone doesn’t change the fact that they did.
I often think that it would be more productive to discuss sexism, racism, classism, homophobia, fat-phobia and the like not as something that defines a person, but as thoughts and acts that people commit. It would certainly be easier to call people on their sexism if that didn’t make them “a sexist”, to get people to own up to, challenge and change their racism if admitting it didn’t equate to being evil.
Text posted at 09:00
24/07/2009
via Sociological Images:
“ALL FIGURED OUT–This chart is used by judges as [a] guide in picking Miss Universe. First six show figure flaws, seventh is perfectly proportioned. (1) Shoulders too square. (2) Shoulders too sloping. (3) Hips too wide. (4) Shoulder bones too pronounced. (5) Shoulders and back hunched. (6) Legs irregular, with spaces at calves, knees, thighs. (7) The form divine, needs only a beautiful face.”
(via bakanel:soc.images)
Photo posted at 09:00
09/07/2009
Two things:
1. I had a shoot with a very renowned photographer two years ago. His wife was assisting on the shoot, and before I went on set she sat me down. At the time, I weighed about 97lbs on my 5’7” frame. All my bones were sticking out. She gave me a carrot muffin (ew) and a glass of juice. She told me I wasn’t allowed to shoot until I had eaten the whole thing and drank the juice. I ate some of the muffin and then when she turned her back, I hid the rest in a garbage can at the makeup table. I did drink the juice. She came back and made me drink another glass of juice. Only then was I allowed to shoot.
2. Never underestimate the power of an anorexic to lie, manipulate, and trick. Those models— not all of them, but some of them to be sure— have been living and working with eating disorders for a long time. In the hectic mess backstage at a runway show, chances are no one is going to notice whether or not she has eaten. They will only inquire and dumbly believe.
„Boxcar Kyla, in response to my previous post.
Quote posted at 14:17
Skinny models aren’t just a result of skinny beauty ideals. Jezebel’s “TatianaTheAnonymousModel” writes:
This sign was taped up backstage at the Givenchy couture show in Paris. At least someone is finally noticing the long hours and working conditions during show season aren’t conducive to regular meals for the models.
Photo posted at 09:49
17/06/2009
Now it’s no wonder that her name means beauty, her looks have got no parallel…
“Belle”, by Dina Goldstein. Part VII of the Fallen Princesses series.
Photo posted at 09:18